Everyone thinks AR/VR requires a PhD and a Hollywood budget. It does not.
The real blocker is fuzzy ideas and no plan. People jump to vendors, demo cool goggles, then stall out because no one can explain the business win in one sentence.
I’ve helped nontechnical teams ship AR VR pilots that sales teams actually use and ops teams do not hate. Fewer toys… more ROI.
By the end:
Before we dive into prompts, here’s the flow in plain English. You’ll give Gemini your context once. Prompt 1 collects it and pulls fresh web context. Prompts 2 and 3 transform that into a shortlist, a cost template, and a 1‑page guide. You walk away with a decision‑ready plan.
– Industry and primary business goal for AR/VR (Real Estate)
– Target users and the job to be done (Increase number of inbound leads to CRM)
– Budget range for a pilot and year one ($5000 & $10000)
– Timeline urgency and key launch date (Q1 of next year)
– In‑house skills and tools (limited capabilities)
– Deployment environment: on‑prem, cloud, MDM, app stores (no idea)
– Compliance or data sensitivity constraints (GDPR)
– Regions and languages required (US, English)
– Example apps you like or competitor moves (Don’t have any at the moment)
– Success metrics: revenue saved, time saved, error rate, NPS (increased conversion rate on web traffic)
– Recent device landscape and pricing: Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, HTC Vive XR Elite
– SDK and engine updates: Unity, Unreal Engine, ARKit, ARCore
– Industry AR/VR case studies and adoption benchmarks
– Development cost and timeline ranges from reputable firms
– Competitor or peer examples in your industry
– News in the last 12–24 months that could impact feasibility
Paste each prompt in order into Gemini. Do Prompt 1 once. Then run Prompts 2 and 3 using the outputs from the prior step. If browsing is available, the prompts will cite fresh sources. If it is not, they will insert [PLACEHOLDER] markers and a quick Web Pull Plan so you can fill gaps fast.
👉 Copy this prompt into Gemini, fill in the bold placeholders, then run it.
DESCRIPTION
Collect my AR/VR project context and pull recent web research to inform decisions.
TASK
Summarize my inputs, fetch relevant sources from the last 12–24 months, and return a clean brief.
ROLE
Senior AR/VR Product Strategist with web research capability.
INPUTS
Company and product in one sentence: [Your Company + 1‑liner]
Industry and sub‑industry: [Industry]
Primary business goal for AR VR: [e.g., reduce training time 40 percent]
Target users and core job to be done: [Who + JTBD]
Budget windows: pilot [$] and year‑one [$]
Timeline target: [Date or quarter]
In‑house capabilities: [e.g., Unity dev, 3D, none]
Deployment constraints: [on‑prem, MDM, app stores, SSO]
Compliance or data sensitivity: [PHI, PII, export]
Regions and languages: [e.g., US and DE]
Competitor or exemplar apps you like: [Names or links]
Success metrics: [KPIs to move]
Auto Web Pulls: fetch and summarize only what materially improves output
Device landscape and pricing: Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, HTC Vive XR Elite
SDK and engine updates: Unity, Unreal Engine, ARKit, ARCore
Industry AR VR case studies and ROI stats in my industry
Development cost and timeline benchmarks from reputable firms
Competitor examples or press in my space from last 12–24 months
WORKFLOW
1) Normalize my inputs into a short brief.
2) Run targeted searches for each Auto Web Pull item. Prefer primary or official sources. Bias to last 12–24 months.
3) Keep only facts that affect feasibility, cost, timeline, or ROI.
4) Return top 5–8 sources with one‑line why it matters.
5) Produce a constraints inventory and opportunity map.
6) Flag any missing critical info as [PLACEHOLDER].
OUTPUT FORMAT
Project Brief: 6–10 bullets
Constraints Inventory: bullets
Opportunity Map: bullets
Web Findings: bullet list with inline citations (Source, Year) and link
Data Gaps: bullets with [PLACEHOLDER]
RULES
No chain of thought. Just results.
Summaries under 120 words per section.
Use inline citations like this: (Apple, 2024).
If multiple conflicting claims, note the spread and prefer official docs.
FALLBACK
If browsing is unavailable: output a Web Pull Plan with 6 searches and [PLACEHOLDER] citations. Use my inputs to infer likely ranges and mark them clearly.
👉 Paste this prompt after Prompt 1 completes. Do not add new inputs.
DESCRIPTION
Turn the brief and web findings into a ranked plan with feasibility, ROI logic, and stack picks.
TASK
Score use cases, pick devices and tech stack, and produce intermediate artifacts for decision‑making.
ROLE
Principal AR/VR Solutions Architect with cost modeling chops.
INPUTS
Use the full output of Prompt 1: Project Brief, Constraints Inventory, Opportunity Map, and Web Findings.
WORKFLOW
1) Generate 5–7 candidate use cases tailored to the brief.
2) Score each on Impact, Confidence, Effort, and Strategic Fit: 1–5 each. Brief rationale.
3) Shortlist the top 3.
4) For each shortlisted use case:
- Feasibility Matrix: device fit, SDK, content type, data needs, compliance notes
- ROI Sketch: value drivers, cost buckets, payback guess with ranges and citations where relevant
- Timeline Plan: prototype, pilot, scale windows
- Risks and Mitigations: top 5
5) Tech Stack Map: devices, engine, SDKs, hosting, auth, analytics, content pipeline.
6) Cite any claims from web findings with inline citations (Source, Year).
Additionally, generate 10 messaging angles across these frames: Authority, Story, Scarcity, Results, Reality Check, Inversion, Value Shift, Identity, Future‑Pacing, Social Proof. Return a table: Frame | Angle | 2‑line example | Use‑case. Bold the top 3 by expected impact.
OUTPUT FORMAT
Candidate Use Cases Table
Shortlist Summary: 3 picks with one‑liner value prop each
Feasibility Matrix per shortlisted use case
ROI Sketch per shortlisted use case with ranges
Timeline Plan per shortlisted use case
Risks and Mitigations list
Tech Stack Map
Messaging Angles Table as specified
RULES
No new inputs.
Keep each rationale to 2–3 lines.
Use clear language for nontechnical readers.
Include inline citations for any web‑informed numbers or claims.
FALLBACK
If data is thin: generate generic patterns for the stated industry, mark assumptions as [PLACEHOLDER], and keep ranges conservative.
👉 Paste this prompt after Prompt 2 completes. Do not add new inputs.
DESCRIPTION
Assemble a paste‑ready 1‑page guide, a cost structure template, and top technology recommendations.
TASK
Create the final deliverables with plain‑English sections and copy I can paste into a PDF, doc, or page.
ROLE
Senior Product Marketing Writer for Emerging Tech.
INPUTS
Use all outputs from Prompts 1 and 2.
WORKFLOW
1) Build a 1‑page guide titled: Your AR/VR Quick Win Plan.
Sections:
- Context in One Paragraph
- The Shortlist: Top 3 Use Cases
- Why These Three
- Devices and Tech We Recommend
- Timeline and Milestones
- Cost and Payback at a Glance
- Risks and How We Manage Them
- Success Metrics to Track
Include inline citations where claims rely on web findings: (Source, Year).
2) Create a Cost Structure Template with editable ranges:
- One table for Pilot and one for Scale
- Rows: Discovery, 3D/UX, Development, Integrations, Testing, Compliance/Security, Devices, Content Ops, PM, Contingency
- Columns: Low, Likely, High, Notes
3) Produce Top Technology Recommendations:
- Devices with why they fit
- Engine and SDK picks with reasons
- Hosting, auth, analytics, content pipeline
- Procurement notes and links
4) Write everything in nontechnical language.
5) Close with a simple CTA suggestion.
OUTPUT FORMAT
1‑Page Guide: Markdown sectioned content, max 600–800 words
Cost Structure Template: Markdown tables
Technology Recommendations: bullets with links and citations where relevant
RULES
Keep sentences short. No jargon.
Use inline citations and links where used.
No chain of thought. Just the artifact.
Do not invent precise prices: use ranges with units and cite sources when possible.
FALLBACK
If any upstream section is missing: include [PLACEHOLDER] headers and a one‑line instruction on what to fill.
👉 Paste this prompt after Prompt 3 completes. Do not add new inputs.
DESCRIPTION
Tie the asset to funnel placement and handle objections.
TASK
Explain where this asset fits, when to deploy, who should use it, and answer top objections.
ROLE
Enterprise GTM Strategist for Technical Services.
INPUTS
Use the prior outputs.
WORKFLOW
1) Funnel Placement: where the 1‑pager works best and what comes before and after.
2) Roles and Use: who sends it, who reads it, how to present it.
3) When to deploy: triggers and timing windows.
4) Top 2 objections with 2–3 line counters tied to the asset’s specifics.
5) Add a micro next step: 15‑min scoping call agenda.
OUTPUT FORMAT
Funnel Fit: bullets
Roles and Use: bullets
Timing Triggers: bullets
Objections and Counters: bullets
Next Step Agenda: bullets
RULES
Keep it crisp.
Reference the asset sections by name.
No new research. No new inputs.
FALLBACK
If context is thin: provide generic B2B guidance and mark assumptions as [PLACEHOLDER].
You do not need to be technical to make a smart AR/VR bet. This guide turns your business inputs plus fresh web context into a shortlist you can defend, a stack you can procure, and a cost template finance can live with.
Founders, COOs, and enablement leads benefit most when there is a clear business problem: training time, field service errors, sales enablement gaps, remote collaboration, or high‑cost site visits. If you have budget bands and a target date, you can get to a confident yes or no quickly.
Next: run Prompt 1 with your context. Ship the 1‑pager from Prompt 3 to your leadership chat and book a 15‑minute scoping call. If it gets traction, move a prototype into a 30‑day pilot and monitor the metrics you picked.
You can keep guessing… or you can make a small, smart AR/VR move today.
Book at 20 Minute Audit —> https://calendly.com/seisan-jt/15min
